Deputies!
Men of the German Reichstag!
A year of world-historical events is
coming to an end. A year of great decisions is approaching. In this grave
period I speak to you, deputies of the Reichstag, as the representatives of the
German nation. In addition, the entire German nation should also review what
has happened and take note of the decisions required by the present and the
future.
After the repeated rejection of my
peace proposal in 1940 by the British prime minister [Winston Churchill] and
the clique that supports and controls him, it was clear by the fall of that year
that this war would have to be fought through to the end, contrary to all logic
and necessity. You, my old Party comrades, know that I have always detested
half-hearted or weak decisions. If Providence has deemed that the German people
are not to be spared this struggle, then I am thankful that She has entrusted
me with the leadership in a historic conflict that will be decisive in
determining the next five hundred or one thousand years, not only of our German
history, but also of the history of Europe and even of the entire world.
The German people and its soldiers
work and fight today not only for themselves and their own age, but also for
many generations to come. A historical task of unique dimensions has been
entrusted to us by the Creator that we are now obliged to carry out.
The western armistice which was
possible shortly after the conclusion of the conflict in Norway [in June 1940]
compelled the German leadership, first of all, to militarily secure the most
important political, strategic and economic areas that had been won.
Consequently, the defense capabilities of the lands which were conquered at
that time have changed.
From Kirkenes [in northern Norway]
to the Spanish frontier stretches the most extensive belt of great defense
installations and fortresses. Countless air fields have been built, including
some in the far north that were blasted out of granite. The number and strength
of the protected submarine shelters that defend naval bases are such that they
are practically impregnable from both the sea and the air. They are defended by
more than one and a half thousand gun battery emplacements, which had to be
surveyed, planned and built. A network of roads and rail lines has been laid
out so that the connections [to the installations] between the Spanish frontier
and Petsamo [in northern Norway] can be defended independently from the sea.
The installations built by the Pioneer and construction battalions of the navy,
army and air force in cooperation with the Todt Organization are not at all inferior
to those of the Westwall [along the German frontier with France]. The work to
further strengthen all this continues without pause. I am determined to make
this European front impregnable against any enemy attack.
This defensive work, which continued
during the past winter, was complemented by military offensives insofar as
seasonal conditions permitted. German naval forces above and below the waves
continued their steady war of annihilation against the naval and merchant
vessels of Britain and her subservient allies. Through reconnaissance flights
and air attacks, the German air force helps to destroy enemy shipping and in
countless retaliation air attacks to give the British a better idea of the
reality of the so-called "exciting war," which is the creation,
above all, of the current British prime minister [Churchill].
During the past summer Germany was
supported in this struggle above all by her Italian ally. For many months our
ally Italy bore on its shoulders the main weight of a large part of British
might. Only because of the enormous superiority in heavy tanks were the British
able to bring about a temporary crisis in North Africa, but by March 24 of this
year a small combined force of German and Italian units under the command of
General [Erwin] Rommel began a counterattack. Agedabia fell on April 2.
Benghazi was reached on the 4th. Our combined forces entered Derna on the 8th,
Tobruk was encircled on the 11th, and Bardia was occupied on April 12. The
achievement of the German Afrika Korps is all the more outstanding because this
field of battle is completely alien and unfamiliar to the Germans, climatically
and otherwise. As once in Spain [1936-1939], so now in North Africa, Germans
and Italians stand together against the same enemy.
While these daring actions were
again securing the North African front with the blood of German and Italian
soldiers, the threatening clouds of terrible danger were gathering over Europe.
Compelled by bitter necessity, I decided in the fall of 1939 to at least try to
create the prerequisite conditions for a general peace by eliminating the acute
tension between Germany and Soviet Russia [with the German-Soviet
non-aggression pact of August 23, 1939]. This was psychologically difficult
because of the basic attitude toward Bolshevism of the German people and, above
all, of the [National Socialist] Party. Objectively, though, this was a simple
matter because in all the countries that Britain said were threatened by us and
which were offered military alliances, Germany actually had only economic
interests.
I may remind you, deputies and men
of the German Reichstag, that throughout the spring and summer of 1939 Britain
offered military alliances to a number of countries, claiming that Germany
intended to invade them and rob them of their freedom. However, the German
Reich and its government could assure them with a clear conscience that these
insinuations did not correspond to the truth in any way. Moreover, there was
the sober military realization that in case of a war which might be forced upon
the German nation by British diplomacy, the struggle could be fought on two
fronts only with very great sacrifices. And after the Baltic states, Romania,
and so forth, were inclined to accept the British offers of military alliance,
and thereby made clear that they also believed themselves to be threatened [by
Germany], it was not only the right but also the duty of the German Reich
government to delineate the [geographical] limits of German interests [between
Germany and the USSR].
All the same, the countries involved
realized very quickly -- which was unfortunate for the German Reich as well --
that the best and strongest guarantee against the [Soviet] threat from the East
was Germany. When those countries, on their own initiative, cut their ties with
the German Reich and instead put their trust in promises of aid from a power
[Britain] that, in its proverbial egotism, has for centuries never given help
but has always demanded it, they were thereby lost. Even so, the fate of these
countries aroused the strongest sympathy of the German people. The winter war
of the Finns [against the Soviet Union, 1939-1940] aroused in us a feeling of
admiration mixed with bitterness: admiration because, as a soldierly nation, we
have a sympathetic heart for heroism and sacrifice, and bitterness because our
concern for the enemy threat in the West and the danger in the East meant that
we were no position to help. When it became clear to us that Soviet Russia
concluded that the [German-Soviet] delineation [in August 1939] of political
spheres of influence gave it the right to practically exterminate foreign
nations, the [German-Soviet] relationship was maintained only for utilitarian
reasons, contrary to reason and sentiment.
Already in 1940 it became increasingly
clear from month to month that the plans of the men in the Kremlin were aimed
at the domination, and thus the destruction, of all of Europe. I have already
told the nation of the build-up of Soviet Russian military power in the East
during a period when Germany had only a few divisions in the provinces
bordering Soviet Russia. Only a blind person could fail to see that a military
build-up of unique world-historical dimensions was being carried out. And this
was not in order to protect something that was being threatened, but rather
only to attack that which seemed incapable of defense.
The quick conclusion of the campaign
in the West [May-June 1940] meant that those in power in Moscow were not able
to count on the immediate exhaustion of the German Reich. However, they did not
change their plans at all, but only postponed the timing of their attack. The
summer of 1941 seemed like the ideal moment to strike. A new Mongol invasion
was ready to pour across Europe. Mr. Churchill also promised that there would
be a change in the British war against Germany at this same time. In a cowardly
way, he now tries to deny that during a secret meeting in the British House of
Commons in 1940 he said that an important factor for the successful
continuation and conclusion of this war would be the Soviet entry into the war,
which would come during 1941 at the latest, and which would also make it
possible for Britain to take the offensive. Conscious of our duty, this past
spring we observed the military build-up of a world power that seemed to have
inexhaustible reserves of human and material resources. Dark clouds began to
gather over Europe.
What is Europe, my deputies? There
is no geographical definition of our continent, but only an ethnic-national [volkliche]
and cultural one. The frontier of this continent is not the Ural mountains, but
rather the line that divides the Western outlook on life from that of the
East.
At one time, Europe was confined to
the Greek isles, which had been reached by Nordic tribes, and where the flame
first burned that slowly but steadily enlightened humanity. And when these
Greeks fought against the invasion of the Persian conquerors, they did not just
defend their own small homeland, which was Greece, but [also] that concept that
is now Europe. And then [the spirit of] Europe shifted from Hellas to Rome.
Roman thought and Roman statecraft combined with Greek spirit and Greek
culture. An empire was created, the importance and creative power of which has
never been matched, much less surpassed, even to this day. And when the Roman
legions defended Italy in three terrible wars against the attack of Carthage
from Africa, and finally battled to victory, in this case as well Rome fought
not just for herself, but [also] for the Greco-Roman world that then
encompassed Europe.
The next invasion against the home
soil of this new culture of humanity came from the wide expanses of the East. A
horrific storm of cultureless hordes from the center of Asia poured deep into
the heart of the European continent, burning, ravaging and murdering as a true
scourge of God. On the Catalaunian fields , Roman and Germanic men fought
together for the first time [in 451] in a decisive battle of tremendous
importance for a culture that had begun with the Greeks, passed on to the
Romans, and then encompassed the Germanic peoples.
Europe had matured. The Occident
arose from Hellas and Rome, and for many centuries its defense was the task not
only of the Romans, but above all of the Germanic peoples. What we call Europe is
the geographic territory of the Occident, enlightened by Greek culture,
inspired by the powerful heritage of the Roman empire, its territory enlarged
by Germanic colonization. Whether it was the German emperors fighting back
invasions from the East on the Unstrut [river, in 933] or on the Lechfeld
[plain, in 955], or others pushing back Africa from Spain over a period of many
years, it was always a struggle of a developing Europe against a profoundly
alien outside world.
Just as Rome once made her immortal
contribution to the building and defense of the continent, so now have the
Germanic peoples taken up the defense and protection of a family of nations
which, although they may differ and diverge in their political structure and
goals, nevertheless together constitute a racially and culturally unified and
complementary whole.
And from this Europe there have not
only been settlements in other parts of the world, but intellectual-spiritual [geistig]
and cultural fertilization as well, a fact that anyone realizes who is willing
to acknowledge the truth rather than deny it. Thus, it was not England that
cultivated the continent, but rather Anglo-Saxon and Norman branches of the
Germanic nation that moved from our continent to the [British] island and made possible
her development, which is certainly unique in history. In the same way, it was
not America that discovered Europe, but the other way around. And all that
which America did not get from Europe may seem worthy of admiration to a
Jewified mixed race, but Europe regards that merely as symptomatic of decay in
artistic and cultural life, the product of Jewish or Negroid blood
mixture.
My Deputies! Men of the German
Reichstag!
I have to make these remarks because
this struggle, which became obviously unavoidable in the early months of this
year, and which the German Reich, above all, is called upon this time to lead,
also greatly transcends the interests of our own people and nation. When the
Greeks once stood against the Persians, they defended more than just Greece.
When the Romans stood against the Carthaginians, they defended more than just
Rome. When the Roman and Germanic peoples stood together against the Huns, they
defended more than just the West. When German emperors stood against the
Mongols, they defended more than just Germany. And when Spanish heroes stood
against Africa, they defended not just Spain, but all of Europe as well. In the
same way, Germany does not fight today just for itself, but for our entire
continent.
And it is an auspicious sign that
this realization is today so deeply rooted in the subconscious of most European
nations that they participate in this struggle, either with open expressions of
support or with streams of volunteers.
When the German and Italian armies
took the offensive against Yugoslavia and Greece on April 6 of this year, that
was the prelude to the great struggle in which we now find ourselves. That is
because the revolt in Belgrade [on March 26, 1941], which led to the overthrow
of the former prince regent and his government, determined the further
development of events in that part of Europe. Although Britain played a major
role in that coup, Soviet Russia played the main role. What I had refused to
Mr. Molotov [the Soviet Foreign Minister] during his visit to Berlin [in
November 1940], Stalin believed he could obtain indirectly against our will by
revolutionary activity. Without regard for the treaties they had signed, the
Bolshevik rulers expanded their ambitions. The [Soviet] treaty of friendship
with the new revolutionary regime [in Belgrade ] showed very quickly just how
threatening the danger had become.
The achievements of the German armed
forces in this campaign were honored in the German Reichstag on May 4, 1941. At
that time, though, I was not able to reveal that we were very quickly
approaching a confrontation with a state [Soviet Russia] that did not attack at
the time of the campaign in the Balkans only because its military build-up was
not yet complete, and because it was not able to use its air fields as a result
of the mud from melting snow at this time of year, which made it impossible to
use the runways.
My Deputies! Men of the
Reichstag!
When I became aware of the
possibility of a threat to the east of the Reich in 1940 through [secret] reports
from the British House of Commons and by observations of Soviet Russian troop
movements on our frontiers, I immediately ordered the formation of many new
armored, motorized and infantry divisions. The human and material resources for
them were abundantly available. [In this regard] I can make only one promise to
you, my deputies, and to the entire German nation: while people in democratic
countries understandably talk a lot about armaments, in National Socialist
Germany all the more will actually be produced. It has been that way in the
past, and it is not any different now. Whenever decisive action has to be
taken, we will have, with each passing year, more and, above all, better
quality weapons.
We realized very clearly that under
no circumstances could we allow the enemy the opportunity to strike first into
our heart. Nevertheless, in this case the decision [to attack Soviet Russia]
was a very difficult one. When the writers for the democratic newspapers now
declare that I would have thought twice before attacking if I had known the
strength of the Bolshevik adversaries, they show that they do not understand
either the situation or me.
I have not sought war. To the
contrary, I have done everything to avoid conflict. But I would forget my duty
and my conscience if I were to do nothing in spite of the realization that a
conflict had become unavoidable. Because I regarded Soviet Russia as the
gravest danger not only for the German Reich but for all of Europe, I decided,
if possible, to give the order myself to attack a few days before the outbreak
of this conflict.
A truly impressive amount of
authentic material is now available which confirms that a Soviet Russian attack
was intended. We are also sure about when this attack was to take place. In
view of this danger, the extent of which we are perhaps only now truly aware, I
can only thank the Lord God that He enlightened me in time, and has given me
the strength to do what must be done. Millions of German soldiers may thank Him
for their lives, and all of Europe for its existence.
I may say this today: If this wave
of more than 20,000 tanks, hundreds of divisions, tens of thousands of
artillery pieces, along with more than 10,000 airplanes, had not been kept from
being set into motion against the Reich, Europe would have been lost.
Several nations have been destined
to prevent or parry this blow through the sacrifice of their blood. If Finland
[for one] had not immediately decided, for the second time, to take up weapons,
then the comfortable bourgeois life of the other Nordic countries would quickly
have been extinguished.
If the German Reich, with its
soldiers and weapons, had not stood against this opponent, a storm would have
burned over Europe that would have eliminated, once and for all time, and in
all its intellectual paucity and traditional stupidity, the laughable British
idea of the European balance of power.
If the Slovaks, Hungarians and
Romanians had not also acted to defend this European world, then the Bolshevik
hordes would have poured over the Danube countries as did once the swarms of
Attila's Huns, and [Soviet] Tatars and Mongols would [then], on the open
country by the Ionian Sea, force a revision of the Treaty of Montreux [regarding
the Dardanelles strait].
If Italy, Spain and Croatia had not
sent their divisions, then a European defense front would not have arisen that
proclaims the concept of a new Europe and thereby powerfully inspires all other
nations as well. Because of this awareness of danger, volunteers have come from
northern and western Europe: Norwegians, Danes, Dutch, Flemish, Belgians and
even French. They have all given the struggle of the allied forces of the Axis
the character of a European crusade, in the truest sense of the word.
This is not yet the right time to
speak of the planning and direction of this campaign. However, in a few
sentences I would like to say something about what has been achieved [so far]
in this greatest conflict in history. Because of the enormous area involved as
well as the number and size of the events, individual impressions may be lost
and forgotten.
The attack began at dawn on June 22
[1941]. With dauntless daring, the frontier fortifications that were meant to
protect the Soviet Russian build-up against us from surprise attack were broken
through. Grodno fell by June 23. On June 24, following the capture of
Brest-Litovsk, the fortress [there] was taken in combat, and Vilnius and Kaunas
[in Lithuania] were also taken. Daugavpils [in Latvia] fell on June 26.
The first two great encirclement
battles near Bialystok and Minsk were completed on July 10. We captured 324,000
prisoners of war, 3,332 tanks and 1,809 artillery pieces. By July 13 the Stalin
Line had been broken through at almost every decisive point. Smolensk fell on
July 16 after heavy fighting, and German and Romanian units were able to force
their way across the Dniester [river] on July 19. The Battle of Smolensk ended
on August 6 after many encircling operations. As a result, another 310,000
Russians were taken as prisoners. Moreover, 3,205 tanks and 3,120 artillery
pieces were counted -- either destroyed or captured. Just three days later the
fate of another Soviet Russian army group was sealed. On August 9, in the battle
of Uman, another 103,000 Soviet Russian prisoners of war were taken, and 317
tanks and 1,100 artillery pieces were either destroyed or captured.
Nikolayev [in the Ukraine] fell on
August 13, and Kherson was taken on the 21st. On the same day the battle near
Gomel ended, resulting in 84,000 prisoners as well as 144 tanks and 848
artillery pieces either captured or destroyed. The Soviet Russian positions
between the Ilmen and Peipus [lakes] were broken through on August 21, while
the bridgehead around Dnepropetrovsk fell into our hands on August 26. On the
28th of that month German troops entered Tallinn and Paldiski [Estonia] after
heavy fighting, while the Finns took Vyborg on the 20th. With the capture of
Petrokrepost on September 8, Leningrad was finally cut off from the south. By
September 16 bridgeheads across the Dnieper were formed, and on September 18
Poltava fell into the hands of our soldiers. German units stormed the fortress
of Kiev on September 19, and on September 22 the conquest of [the Baltic island
of] Saaremaa [Oesel] was crowned by the capture of its capital.
And now came the anticipated results
of the greatest undertakings. The battle near Kiev was completed on September
27. Endless columns of 665,000 prisoners of war marched to the west. In the
encircled area, 884 tanks and 3,178 artillery pieces were captured. The battle
to break through the central area of the Eastern front began on October 2,
while the battle of the Azov Sea was successfully completed on October 11.
Another 107,000 prisoners, 212 tanks and 672 artillery pieces were counted.
After heavy fighting, German and Romanian units were able to enter Odessa on
October 16. The battle to break through the center of the Eastern front, which
had begun on October 2, ended on October 18 with a success that is unique in
world history. The result was 663,000 prisoners, as well as 1,242 tanks and
5,452 artillery pieces either destroyed or captured. The capture of Dagoe
[Hiiumaa island] was completed on October 21. The industrial center of Kharkov
was taken on October 24. After very heavy fighting, the Crimea was finally
reached, and on November 2 the capital of Simferopol was stormed. On November
16 the Crimea was overrun as far as Kerch.
As of December 1, the total number
of captured Soviet Russian prisoners was 3,806,865. The number of destroyed or
captured tanks was 21,391, of artillery pieces 32,541, and of airplanes
17,322.
During this same period of time,
2,191 British airplanes were shot down. The navy sank 4,170,611 gross
registered tons of shipping, and the air force sank 2,346,180 tons. Altogether,
6,516,791 gross registered tons were destroyed.
My Deputies! My German people!
These are sober facts and, perhaps,
dry figures. But may they never be forgotten by history or vanish from the
memory of our own German nation! For behind these figures are the achievements,
sacrifices and sufferings, the heroism and readiness to die of millions of the
best men of our own people and of the countries allied with us. Everything had
to be fought for at the cost of health and life, and through struggle such as
those back in the homeland can hardly imagine.
They have marched endless distances,
tortured by heat and thirst, often bogged down with despair in the mud of
bottomless dirt roads, exposed to the hardships of a climate that varies
between the White and Black Seas from the intense heat of July and August days
to the winter storms of November and December, tormented by insects, suffering
from dirt and pests, freezing in snow and ice, they fought -- the Germans and
the Finns, the Italians, Slovaks, Hungarians, Romanians and Croatians, the
volunteers from the northern and western European countries -- in short, the
soldiers of the Eastern front!
Today I will not single out specific
branches of the armed forces or praise specific leaders -- they have all done
their best. And yet, truth and justice requires that something be mentioned
again: As in the past, so also today, of all of our German fighting men in
uniform, the greatest burden of battle is born by our ever-present infantry
soldiers.
From June 22 to December 1 [1941],
the German army has lost in this heroic struggle: 158,773 dead, 563,082 wounded
and 31,191 missing. The air force has lost: 3,231 dead, 8,453 wounded and 2,028
missing. The navy: 310 dead, 232 wounded and 115 missing. For the German armed
forces altogether: 162,314 dead, 571,767 wounded and 33,334 missing.
That is, the number of dead and
wounded is somewhat more than double the number of those lost in the [four
month long] battle of the Somme of the [First] World War [in 1916], but
somewhat less than half the number of missing in that battle -- all the same,
fathers and sons of our German people.
And now let me speak about another
world, one that is represented by a man [President Franklin Roosevelt] who
likes to chat nicely at the fireside while nations and their soldiers fight in
snow and ice: above all, the man who is primarily responsible for this
war.
When the nationality problem in the
former Polish state was growing ever more intolerable in 1939, I attempted to
eliminate the unendurable conditions by means of a just agreement. For a
certain time it seemed as if the Polish government was seriously considering
giving its approval to a reasonable solution. I may also add here that in all
of these German proposals, nothing was demanded that had not previously
belonged to Germany. In fact, we were willing to give up much that had belonged
to Germany before the [First] World War.
You will recall the dramatic events
of that period -- the steadily increasing numbers of victims among the ethnic
Germans [in Poland]. You, my deputies, are best qualified to compare this loss
of life with that of the present war. The military campaign in the East has so
far cost the entire German armed forces about 160,000 deaths, whereas during
just a few months of peace [in 1939] more than 62,000 ethnic Germans were
killed, including some who were horribly tortured. There is no question that
the German Reich had the right to protest against this situation on its border
and to press for its elimination, if for no other reason than for its own
security, particularly since we live in an age in which [some] other countries
[notably, the USA and Britain] regard their security at stake even in foreign
continents. In geographical terms, the problems to be resolved were not very
important. Essentially they involved Danzig [Gdansk] and a connecting link
between the torn-away province of East Prussia and the rest of the Reich. Of
much greater concern were the brutal persecutions of the Germans in Poland. In
addition, the other minority population groups [notably the Ukrainians] were
subject to a fate that was no less severe.
During those days in August [1939],
when the Polish attitude steadily hardened, thanks to Britain's blank check of
unlimited backing, the German Reich was moved to make one final proposal. We
were prepared to enter into negotiations with Poland on the basis of this
proposal, and we verbally informed the British ambassador of the proposal text.
Today I would like to recall that proposal and review it with you.
[Text of the German proposal of
August 29, 1939:]
Proposal for a settlement of the
Danzig-Corridor problem and the German-Polish minority question:
The situation between the German
Reich and Poland is now such that any further incident could lead to action by
the military forces that have taken position on both sides of the frontier. Any
peaceful solution must be such that the basic causes of this situation are
eliminated so that they are not simply repeated, which would mean that not only
eastern Europe but other areas as well would be subject to the same tension.
The causes of this situation are rooted in, first, the intolerable border that
was specified by the dictated peace of Versailles [of 1919], and, second, the
intolerable treatment of the minority populations in the lost
territories.
In making these proposals, the
German Reich government is motivated by the desire to achieve a permanent
solution that will put an end to the intolerable situation arising from the
present border demarcation, secure to both parties vitally important connecting
routes, and which will solve the minority problem, insofar as that is possible,
and if not, will at least insure a tolerable life for the minority populations
with secure guarantees of their rights.
The German Reich government is
convinced that it is absolutely necessary to investigate the economic and
physical damage inflicted since 1918, with full reparations to be made for
that. Of course, it regards this obligation as binding on both sides.
On the basis of these
considerations, we make the following concrete proposals:
1. The Free City of Danzig returns
immediately to the German Reich on the basis of its purely German character and
the unanimous desire of its population.
2. The territory of the so-called
[Polish] Corridor will decide for itself whether it wishes to belong to Germany
or to Poland. This territory consists of the area between the Baltic Sea [in
the north] to a line marked [in the south] by the towns of Marienwerder,
Graudenz, Kuhn and Bromberg -- including these towns -- and then westwards to
Schoenlanke.
3. For this purpose a plebiscite
will be conducted in this territory. All Germans who lived in this territory on
January 1, 1918, or were born there on or before that date will be entitled to
vote in the plebiscite. Similarly, all Poles, Kashubians, and so forth, who
lived in this territory on or before that date, or were born there before that
date, will also be entitled to vote. Germans who were expelled from this
territory will return to vote in the plebiscite.
To insure an impartial plebiscite
and to make sure that all necessary preliminary preparation work is properly carried
out, this territory will come under the authority of an international
commission, similar to the one organized in the Saar territory [for the 1935
plebiscite there]. This commission is to be organized immediately by the four
great powers of Italy, the Soviet Union, France and Britain. This commission
will have all sovereign authority in the territory. Accordingly, Polish
military forces, Polish police and Polish authorities are to clear out of this
territory as soon as possible, by a date to be agreed upon.
4. Not included in this territory is
the Polish port of Gdynia, which is regarded as fundamentally sovereign Polish
territory, to the extent of [ethnic] Polish settlement, but as a matter of
principle is recognized as Polish territory. The specific border of this Polish
port city will be negotiated by Germany and Poland and, if necessary,
established by an international court of arbitration.
5. In order to insure ample time for
the preparations necessary in order to conduct an impartial plebiscite, the
plebiscite will not take place until after at least twelve months have
elapsed.
6. In order to ensure unhindered
traffic between Germany and East Prussia, and between Poland and the [Baltic]
Sea, during this period [before the plebiscite], certain roads and rail lines
may be designated to enable free transit. In that regard, only such fees may be
imposed that are necessary for the maintenance of the transit routes or for
transport itself.
7. A simple majority of the votes
cast will decide whether the territory will go to Germany or to Poland.
8. After the plebiscite has been
conducted, and regardless of the result, free transit will be guaranteed
between Germany and its province of Danzig-East Prussia, as well as between
Poland and the [Baltic] Sea. If the plebiscite determines that the territory
belongs to Poland, Germany will obtain an extraterritorial transit zone,
consisting of a motor super-highway [Reichsautobahn] and a four-track rail
line, approximately along the line of Buetow-Danzig and Dirschau. The highway
and the rail line will be built in such a way that the Polish transit lines are
not disturbed, which means that they will pass either above or underneath. This
zone will be one kilometer wide and will be sovereign German territory. In case
the plebiscite is in Germany's favor, Poland will have free and unrestricted
transit to its port of Gdynia with the same right to an extraterritorial road
and rail line that Germany would have had.
9. If the Corridor returns to
Germany, the German Reich declares that it is ready to carry out an exchange of
population with Poland to the extent that this would be suitable for the
[people of the] Corridor.
10. The special rights that may be
claimed by Poland in the port of Danzig will be negotiated on the basis of
parity for rights to Germany in the port of Gdynia.
11. In order to eliminate all fear
of threat from either side, Danzig and Gdynia will be purely commercial
centers, that is, with no military installations or military
fortifications.
12. The peninsula of Hela, which
will go to either Poland or Germany on the basis of the plebiscite, will also
be demilitarized in any case.
13. The German Reich government has
protested in the strongest terms against the Polish treatment of its minority
populations. For its part, the Polish government also believes itself called
upon to make protests against Germany. Accordingly, both sides agree to submit
these complaints to an international investigation commission, which will be
responsible for investigating all complaints of economic and physical damage as
well as other acts of terror.
Germany and Poland pledge to
compensate for all economic and other damages inflicted on minority populations
on both sides since 1918, and/or to revoke all expropriations and provide for
complete reparation for the victims of these and other economic measures.
14. In order to eliminate feelings
of deprivation of international rights in the part of the Germans who will
remain in Poland, as well as of the Poles who will remain in Germany, and above
all, to insure that they are not forced to act contrary to their
ethnic-national feelings, Germany and Poland agree to guarantee the rights of
the minority populations on both sides through comprehensive and binding
agreements. These will insure the right of these minority groups to maintain,
freely develop and carry on their national-cultural life. In particular, they
will be allowed to maintain organizations for these purposes. Both sides agree
that members of their minority populations will not be drafted for military
service.
15. If agreement is reached on the
basis of these proposals, Germany and Poland declare that they will immediately
order and carry out the demobilization of their armed forces.
16. Germany and Poland will agree to
whatever additional measures may be necessary to implement the above points as
quickly as possible.
[End of the text of the German
proposal]
The same [measures] would have
applied with regard to the proposals to secure [the rights of] the minorities.
This is the treaty proposal – as
straight-forward and as generous as has ever been presented by a government –
that was made by the National Socialist leadership of the German Reich.
The former Polish government refused
to respond to these proposals in any way. In this regard, the question presents
itself: How is it possible that such an unimportant state could dare to simply
disregard such proposals and, in addition, carry out further cruelties against
the Germans, the people who have given this land its entire culture, and even
order the general mobilization of its armed forces?
A look at the documents of the
[Polish] Foreign Ministry in Warsaw later provided the surprising explanation.
They told of the role of a man [President Roosevelt] who, with diabolical lack
of principle, used all of his influence to strengthen Poland's resistance and
to prevent any possibility of understanding. These reports were sent by the
former Polish ambassador in Washington, Count [Jerzy] Potocki, to his
government in Warsaw. These documents clearly and shockingly reveal the extent
to which one man and the powers behind him are responsible for the Second World
War. Another question arises: Why had this man [Roosevelt] developed such a
fanatic hostility against a country that, in its entire history, had never
harmed either America or him?
With regard to Germany's
relationship with America, the following should be said:
1. Germany is perhaps the only great
power which has never had a colony in either North or South America. Nor has it
been otherwise politically active there, apart from the emigration of many
millions of Germans with their skills, from which the American continent, and
particularly the United States, has only benefited.
2. In the entire history of the
development and existence of the United States, the German Reich has never been
hostile or even politically unfriendly towards the United States. To the
contrary, many Germans have given their lives to defend the USA.
3. The German Reich has never
participated in wars against the United States, except when the United States
went to war against it in 1917. It did so for reasons that have been thoroughly
explained by a commission [a special U.S. Senate investigating committee,
1934-1935, chaired by Sen. Gerald Nye], which president Roosevelt himself
established [or rather, endorsed]. This commission to investigate the reasons
for America's entry into the [First World] war clearly established that the
United States entered the war in 1917 solely for the capitalist interests of a
small group, and that Germany itself had no intention to come into conflict
with America.
Furthermore, there are no
territorial or political conflicts between the American and German nations that
could possibly involve the existence or even the [vital] interests of the
United States. The forms of government have always been different. But this
cannot be a reason for hostility between different nations, as long as one form
of government does not try to interfere with another, outside of its naturally
ordained sphere.
America is a republic led by a
president with wide-ranging powers of authority. Germany was once ruled by a
monarchy with limited authority, and then by a democracy that lacked authority.
Today it is a republic of wide-ranging authority. Between these two countries
is an ocean. If anything, the differences between capitalist America and
Bolshevik Russia, if these terms have any meaning at all, must be more
significant than those between an America led by a President and a Germany led
by a Führer.
It is a fact that the two historical
conflicts between Germany and the United States were stimulated by two
Americans, that is, by Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt,
although each was inspired by the same forces. History itself has rendered its
verdict on Wilson. His name will always be associated with the most base
betrayal in history of a pledge [notably, Wilson's "14 points"]. The
result was the ruin of national life, not only in the so-called vanquished countries,
but among the victors as well. Because of this broken pledge, which alone made
possible the imposed Treaty of Versailles [1919], countries were torn apart,
cultures were destroyed and the economic life of all was ruined. Today we know
that a group of self-serving financiers stood behind Wilson. They used this
paralytic professor to lead America into a war from which they hoped to profit.
The German nation once believed this man, and had to pay for this trust with
political and economic ruin.
After such a bitter experience, why
is there now another American president who is determined to incite wars and,
above all, to stir up hostility against Germany to the point of war? National
Socialism came to power in Germany in the same year [1933] that Roosevelt came
to power in the United States. At this point it is important to examine the
factors behind the current developments.
First of all, the personal side of
things: I understand very well that there is a world of difference between my
own outlook on life and attitude, and that of President Roosevelt. Roosevelt
came from an extremely wealthy family. By birth and origin he belonged to that
class of people that is privileged in a democracy and assured of advancement. I
myself was only the child of a small and poor family, and I had to struggle
through life by work and effort in spite of immense hardships. As a member of
the privileged class, Roosevelt experienced the [First] World War in a position
under Wilson's shadow [as assistant secretary of the Navy]. As a result, he
only knew the agreeable consequences of a conflict between nations from which
some profited while others lost their lives. During this same period, I lived
very differently. I was not one of those who made history or profits, but rather
one of those who carried out orders. As an ordinary soldier during those four
years, I tried to do my duty in the face of the enemy. Of course, I returned
from the war just as poor as when I entered in the fall of 1914. I thus shared
my fate with millions of others, while Mr. Roosevelt shared his with the
so-called upper ten thousand.
After the war, while Mr. Roosevelt
tested his skills in financial speculation in order to profit personally from
the inflation, that is, from the misfortune of others, I still lay in a
military hospital along with many hundreds of thousands of others. Experienced
in business, financially secure and enjoying the patronage of his class,
Roosevelt then finally chose a career in politics. During this same period, I
struggled as a nameless and unknown man for the rebirth of my nation, which was
the victim of the greatest injustice in its entire history.
Two different paths in life!
Franklin Roosevelt took power in the United States as the candidate of a
thoroughly capitalistic party, which helps those who serve it. When I became
the Chancellor of the German Reich, I was the leader of a popular national
movement, which I had created myself. The powers that supported Mr. Roosevelt
were the same powers I fought against, out of concern for the fate of my
people, and out of deepest inner conviction. The "brain trust" that
served the new American president was made up of members of the same national
group that we fought against in Germany as a parasitical expression of humanity,
and which we began to remove from public life.
And yet, we also had something in
common: Franklin Roosevelt took control of a country with an economy that had
been ruined as a result of democratic influences, and I assumed the leadership
of a Reich that was also on the edge of complete ruin, thanks to democracy.
There were 13 million unemployed in the United States, while Germany had seven
million unemployed and another seven million part-time workers. In both
countries, public finances were in chaos, and it seemed that the spreading
economic depression could not be stopped.
From then on, things developed in
the United States and in the German Reich in such a way that future generations
will have no difficulty in making a definitive evaluation of the two different
socio-political theories. Whereas the German Reich experienced an enormous
improvement in social, economic, cultural and artistic life in just a few years
under National Socialist leadership, President Roosevelt was not able to bring
about even limited improvements in his own country. This task should have been
much easier in the United States, with barely 15 people per square kilometer,
as compared to 140 in Germany. If economic prosperity is not possible in that
country, it must be the result of either a lack of will by the ruling
leadership or the complete incompetence of the men in charge. In just five
years, the economic problems were solved in Germany and unemployment was
eliminated. During this same period, President Roosevelt enormously increased
his country's national debt, devalued the dollar, further disrupted the economy
and maintained the same number of unemployed.
But this is hardly remarkable when
one realizes that the intellects appointed by this man, or more accurately, who
appointed him, are members of that same group who, as Jews, are interested only
in disruption and never in order. While we in National Socialist Germany took
measures against financial speculation, it flourished tremendously under
Roosevelt. The New Deal legislation of this man was spurious, and consequently
the greatest error ever experienced by anyone. If his economic policies had
continued indefinitely during peace time, there is no doubt that sooner or
later they would have brought down this president, in spite of all his
dialectical cleverness. In a European country his career would certainly have
ended in front of a national court for recklessly squandering the nation's
wealth. And he would hardly have avoided a prison sentence by a civil court for
criminally incompetent business management.
Many respected Americans also shared
this view. A threatening opposition was growing all around this man, which led
him to think that he could save himself only by diverting public attention from
his domestic policies to foreign affairs. In this regard it is interesting to
study the reports of Polish Ambassador Potocki from Washington, which
repeatedly point out that Roosevelt was fully aware of the danger that his
entire economic house of cards could collapse, and that therefore he absolutely
had to divert attention to foreign policy.
The circle of Jews around Roosevelt
encouraged him in this. With Old Testament vindictiveness they regarded the
United States as the instrument that they and he could use to prepare a second
Purim [slaughter of enemies] against the nations of Europe, which were
increasingly anti-Jewish. So it was that the Jews, in all of their satanic
baseness, gathered around this man, and he relied on them.
The American president increasingly
used his influence to create conflicts, intensify existing conflicts, and,
above all, to keep conflicts from being resolved peacefully. For years this man
looked for a dispute anywhere in the world, but preferably in Europe, that he
could use to create political entanglements with American economic obligations
to one of the contending sides, which would then steadily involve America in
the conflict and thus divert attention from his own confused domestic economic
policies.
His actions against the German Reich
in this regard have been particularly blunt. Starting in 1937, he began a
series of speeches, including a particularly contemptible one on October 5,
1937, in Chicago, with which this man systematically incited the American
public against Germany . He threatened to establish a kind of quarantine
against the so-called authoritarian countries. As part of this steady and
growing campaign of hate and incitement, President Roosevelt made another
insulting statement [on Nov. 15, 1938] and then called the American ambassador
in Berlin back to Washington for consultations. Since then the two countries
have been represented only by charges d'affaires.
Starting in November 1938, he began
systematically and consciously to sabotage every possibility of a European
peace policy. In public he hypocritically claimed to be interested in peace
while at the same time he threatened every country that was ready to pursue a
policy of peaceful understanding by blocking credits, economic reprisals,
calling in loans, and so forth. In this regard, the reports of the Polish
ambassadors in Washington, London, Paris and Brussels provide a shocking
insight.
This man increased his campaign of
incitement in January 1939. In a message [on Jan. 4, 1939] to the U.S. Congress
he threatened to take every measure short of war against the authoritarian
countries.
He repeatedly claimed that other
countries were trying to interfere in American affairs, and he talked a lot
about upholding the Monroe Doctrine. Starting in March 1939 he began lecturing
about internal European affairs that were of no concern of the President of the
United States. In the first place, he doesn't understand these problems, and
secondly, even if he did understand them and appreciated the historical
circumstances, he has no more right to concern himself with central European
affairs than the German head of state has to take positions on or make
judgments about conditions in the United States.
Mr. Roosevelt went even beyond that.
Contrary to the rules of international law, he refused to recognize governments
he didn't like, would not accept new ones, refused to dismiss ambassadors of
non-existent countries, and even recognized them as legal governments. He went
so far as to conclude treaties with these ambassadors, which then gave him the
right to simply occupy foreign territories [Greenland and Iceland ].
On April 15, 1939, Roosevelt made
his famous appeal to me and the Duce [Mussolini], which was a mixture of
geographical and political ignorance combined with the arrogance of a member of
the millionaire class. We were called upon to make declarations and to conclude
non-aggression pacts with a number of countries, many of which were not even
independent because they had either been annexed or turned into subordinate
protectorates by countries [Britain and France] allied with Mr. Roosevelt. You
will recall, my Deputies, that then [on April 28, 1939] I gave a polite but
straightforward answer to this obtrusive gentleman, which succeeded in
stopping, at least for a few months, the storm of chatter from this
unsophisticated warmonger.
But now the honorable wife [Eleanor
Roosevelt] took his place. She and her sons [she said] refused to live in a
world such as ours. That is at least understandable, for ours is world of work
and not one of deceit and racketeering. After a short rest, though, he was back
at it. On November 4, 1939, the Neutrality Act was revised and the arms embargo
was repealed in favor of a one-sided supply [of weapons] to Germany's
adversaries. In the same way, he pushed in eastern Asia for economic
entanglements with China that would eventually lead to effective common
interests. That same month he recognized a small group of Polish emigrants as a
so-called government in exile, the only political basis of which was a few
million Polish gold pieces they had taken from Warsaw.
On April 9 [1940] he froze all
Norwegian and Danish assets [in the United States] on the lying pretext of
wanting to keep them from falling into German hands, even though he knew full
well, for example, that Germany has not interfered with, much less taken
control of, the Danish government's administration of its financial affairs.
Along with the other governments in exile, Roosevelt now recognized one for
Norway. On May 15, 1940, Dutch and Belgian governments in exile were also
recognized, and at the same time Dutch and Belgian assets [in the USA ] were
frozen.
This man revealed his true attitude
in a telegram of June 15 [1940] to French premier [Paul] Reynaud. Roosevelt
told him that the American government would double its aid to France, on the
condition that France continue the war against Germany. In order to give
special emphasis to his desire that the war continue, he declared that the
American government would not recognize acquisitions brought about by conquest,
which included, for example, the retaking of territories that had been stolen
from Germany. I do not need to emphasize that now and in the future, the German
government will not be concerned about whether or not the President of the
United States recognizes a border in Europe. I mention this case because it is
characteristic of the systematic incitement of this man, who hypocritically
talks about peace while at the same time he incites to war.
And now he feared that if peace were
to come about in Europe, the billions he had squandered on military spending
would soon be recognized as an obvious case of fraud, because no one would
attack America unless America itself provoked the attack. On June 17, 1940, the
President of the United States froze French assets [in the USA] in order, so he
said, to keep them from being seized by Germany, but in reality to get hold of
the gold that was being brought from Casablanca on an American cruiser.
In July 1940 Roosevelt began to take
many new measures toward war, such as permitting the service of American
citizens in the British air force and the training of British air force
personnel in the United States. In August 1940 a joint military policy for the
United States and Canada was established. In order to make the establishment of
a joint American-Canadian defense committee plausible to at least the stupidest
people, Roosevelt periodically invented crises and acted as if America was
threatened by immediate attack. He would suddenly cancel trips and quickly
return to Washington and do similar things in order to emphasize the
seriousness of the situation to his followers, who really deserve pity.
He moved still closer to war in
September 1940 when he transferred fifty American naval destroyers to the
British fleet, and in return took control of military bases on British
possessions in North and Central America. Future generations will determine the
extent to which, along with all this hatred against socialist Germany, the
desire to easily and safely take control of the British empire in its hour of
disintegration may have also played a role.
After Britain was no longer able to
pay cash for American deliveries he imposed the Lend-Lease Act on the American
people [in March 1941]. As President, he thereby obtained the authority to
furnish lend-lease military aid to countries that he, Roosevelt, decided it was
in America's vital interests to defend. After it became clear that Germany
would not respond under any circumstances to his continued boorish behavior,
this man took another step forward in March 1941.
As early as December 19, 1939, an
American cruiser [the Tuscaloosa] that was inside the security zone
maneuvered the [German] passenger liner Columbus into the hands of
British warships. As a result, it had to be scuttled. On that same day, US
military forces helped in an effort to capture the German merchant ship Arauca.
On January 27, 1940, and once again contrary to international law, the US
cruiser Trenton reported the movements of the German merchant ships Arauca,
La Plata and Wangoni to enemy naval forces.
On June 27, 1940, he announced a
limitation on the free movement of foreign merchant ships in US ports,
completely contrary to international law. In November 1940 he permitted US
warships to pursue the German merchant ships Phrygia, Idarwald
and Rhein until they finally had to scuttle themselves to keep from
falling into enemy hands. On April 13, 1941, American ships were permitted to
pass freely through the Red Sea in order to supply British armies in the Middle
East.
In the meantime, in March [1941] all
German ships were confiscated by the American authorities. In the process,
German Reich citizens were treated in the most degrading way, ordered to
certain locations in violation of international law, put under travel
restrictions, and so forth. Two German officers who had escaped from Canadian
captivity [to the United States] were shackled and returned to the Canadian
authorities, likewise completely contrary to international law.
On March 27 [1941] the same president
who is [supposedly] against all aggression announced support for [General
Dusan] Simovic and his clique of usurpers [in Yugoslavia], who had come to
power in Belgrade after the overthrow of the legal government. Several months
earlier, President Roosevelt had sent [OSS chief] Colonel Donovan, a very
inferior character, to the Balkans with orders to help organize an uprising
against Germany and Italy in Sofia [Bulgaria] and Belgrade. In April he
[Roosevelt] promised lend-lease aid to Yugoslavia and Greece. At the end of
April he recognized Yugoslav and Greek emigrants as governments in exile. And
once again, in violation of international law, he froze Yugoslav and Greek
assets.
Starting in mid-April [1941] US
naval patrols began expanded operations in the western Atlantic, reporting
their observations to the British. On April 26, Roosevelt delivered twenty high
speed patrol boats to Britain. At the same time, British naval ships were
routinely being repaired in US ports. On May 12, Norwegian ships operating for
Britain were armed and repaired [in the USA], contrary to international law. On
June 4, American troop transports arrived in Greenland to build air fields. And
on June 9 came the first British report that a US war ship, acting on orders of
President Roosevelt, had attacked a German submarine near Greenland with depth
charges.
On June 14, German assets in the
United States were frozen, again in violation of international law. On June 17,
on the basis of a lying pretext, President Roosevelt demanded the recall of the
German consuls and the closing of the German consulates. He also demanded the
shutting down of the German "Transocean" press agency, the German
Library of Information [in New York] and the German Reichsbahn [national railway]
office.
On July 6 and 7 [1941], American
armed forces acting on orders from Roosevelt occupied Iceland, which was in the
area of German military operations. He hoped that this action would certainly,
first, finally force Germany into war [against the USA] and, second, also
neutralize the effectiveness of the German submarines, much as in 1915-1916. At
the same time, he promised military aid to the Soviet Union. On July 10 Navy
Secretary [Frank] Knox suddenly announced that the US Navy was under orders to
fire against Axis warships. On September 4 the US destroyer Greer,
acting on his orders, operated together with British airplanes against German
submarines in the Atlantic. Five days later, a German submarine identified US
destroyers as escort vessels with a British convoy.
In a speech delivered on September
11 [1941], Roosevelt at last personally confirmed that he had given the order
to fire against all Axis ships, and he repeated the order. On September 29, US
patrols attacked a German submarine east of Greenland with depth charges. On
October 17 the US destroyer Kearny, operating as an escort for the
British, attacked a German submarine with depth charges, and on November 6 US
armed forces seized the German ship Odenwald in violation of
international law, took it to an American port, and imprisoned its crew.
I will overlook as meaningless the
insulting attacks and rude statements by this so-called President against me
personally. That he calls me a gangster is particularly meaningless, since this
term did not originate in Europe, where such characters are uncommon, but in
America. And aside from that, I simply cannot feel insulted by Mr. Roosevelt
because I regard him, like his predecessor Woodrow Wilson, as mentally unsound
[geisteskrank].
We know that this man, with his
Jewish supporters, has operated against Japan in the same way. I don't need to
go into that here. The same methods were used in that case as well. This man
first incites to war, and then he lies about its causes and makes baseless allegations.
He repugnantly wraps himself in a cloak of Christian hypocrisy, while at the
same time slowly but very steadily leading humanity into war. And finally, as
an old Freemason, he calls upon God to witness that his actions are honorable.
His shameless misrepresentations of truth and violations of law are
unparalleled in history.
I am sure that all of you have
regarded it as an act of deliverance that a country [Japan] has finally acted
to protest against all this in the very way that this man had actually hoped
for, and which should not surprise him now [the attack on Pearl Harbor,
December 7, 1941]. After years of negotiating with this deceiver, the Japanese
government finally had its fill of being treated in such a humiliating way. All
of us, the German people and, I believe, all other decent people around the
world as well, regard this with deep appreciation.
We know the power behind Roosevelt.
It is the same eternal Jew that believes that his hour has come to impose the
same fate on us that we have all seen and experienced with horror in Soviet
Russia. We have gotten to know first hand the Jewish paradise on earth.
Millions of German soldiers have personally seen the land where this
international Jewry has destroyed and annihilated people and property. Perhaps
the President of the United States does not understand this. If so, that only
speaks for his intellectual narrow-mindedness.
And we know that his entire effort
is aimed at this goal: Even if we were not allied with Japan, we would still
realize that the Jews and their Franklin Roosevelt intend to destroy one state
after another. The German Reich of today has nothing in common with the Germany
of the past. For our part, we will now do what this provocateur has been trying
to achieve for years. And not just because we are allied with Japan, but rather
because Germany and Italy with their present leaderships have the insight and
strength to realize that in this historic period the existence or non-existence
of nations is being determined, perhaps for all time. What this other world has
in store for us is clear. They were able to bring the democratic Germany of the
past [1918-1933] to starvation, and they seek to destroy the National Socialist
Germany of today.
When Mr. Churchill and Mr. Roosevelt
declare that they want to one day build a new social order, that's about the
same as a bald-headed barber recommending a tonic guaranteed to make hair grow.
Rather than incite war, these gentlemen, who live in the most socially backward
countries, should have concerned themselves with their own unemployed people.
They have enough misery and poverty in their own countries to keep themselves
busy insuring a just distribution of food there. As far as the German nation is
concerned, it doesn't need charity, either from Mr. Churchill, Mr. Roosevelt or
[British foreign secretary] Mr. Eden -- but it does demand its rights. And it
will do what it must to insure its right to life, even if a thousand Churchills
and Roosevelts conspire together to prevent it.
Our nation has a history of nearly
two thousand years. Never in this long period has it been so united and
determined as it is today, and thanks to the National Socialist movement it
will always be that way. At the same time, Germany has perhaps never been as
far-sighted, and seldom as conscious of honor. Accordingly, today I had the
passports returned to the American charge d'affaires, and he was bluntly
informed of the following:
President Roosevelt's steadily
expanding policy has been aimed at an unlimited world dictatorship. In pursuing
this goal, the United States and Britain have used every means to deny the
German, Italian and Japanese nations the prerequisites for their vital natural
existence. For this reason, the governments of Britain and the United States of
America have opposed every effort to create a new and better order in the
world, for both the present and the future.
Since the beginning of the war [in
September 1939], the American President Roosevelt has steadily committed ever
more serious crimes against international law. Along with illegal attacks
against ships and other property of German and Italian citizens, there have
been threats and even arbitrary deprivations of personal freedom by internment
and such. The increasingly hostile attacks by the American President Roosevelt
have reached the point that he has ordered the U.S. navy, in complete violation
of international law, to immediately and everywhere attack, fire upon and sink
German and Italian ships. American officials have even boasted about
destroying German submarines in this criminal manner. American cruisers have
attacked and captured German and Italian merchant ships, and their peaceful
crews were taken away to imprisonment In addition, President Roosevelt's plan
to attack Germany and Italy with military forces in Europe by 1943 at the
latest was made public in the United States [by the Chicago Tribune and
several other newspapers on Dec. 4, 1941], and the American government made no
effort to deny it.
Despite the years of intolerable
provocations by President Roosevelt, Germany and Italy sincerely and very
patiently tried to prevent the expansion of this war and to maintain relations
with the United States. But as a result of his campaign, these efforts have
failed.
Faithful to the provisions of the
Tripartite Pact of September 27, 1940, German and Italy accordingly now regard
themselves as finally forced to join together on the side of Japan in the
struggle for the defense and preservation of the freedom and independence of
our nations and realms against the United States of America and Britain.
The three powers have accordingly
concluded the following agreement, which was signed today in Berlin:
[Agreement text:]
With an unshakable determination not
to lay down arms until the common war against the United States of America and
Britain has been fought to a successful conclusion, the German, Italian and
Japanese governments have agreed to the following:
Article 1. Germany, Italy and Japan
will together conduct the war that has been forced upon them by the United
States of America and Britain with all the means at their command to a
victorious conclusion.
Article 2. Germany, Italy and Japan
pledge not to conclude an armistice or make peace with either the United States
of America or Britain unless by complete mutual agreement.
Article 3. Germany, Italy and Japan
will also work very closely together after a victorious conclusion of the war
for the purpose of bringing about a just new order in accord with the
Tripartite Pact concluded by them on September 27, 1940.
Article 4. This agreement is
effective immediately upon signing and is valid for the same period as the
Tripartite Pact of September 27, 1940. The high contracting parties shall
inform each other in due time before the expiration of this term of validity of
their plans for cooperation as laid out in Article 3 of this agreement.
[End of Agreement text]
Deputies! Men of the German
Reichstag!
Ever since my peace proposal of July
1940 was rejected, we have clearly realized that this struggle must be fought
through to the end. We National Socialists are not at all surprised that the
Anglo-American, Jewish and capitalist world is united together with Bolshevism.
In our country we have always found them in the same community. Alone we
successfully fought against them here in Germany, and after 14 years of
struggle for power we were finally able to annihilate our enemies.
When I decided 23 years ago to enter
political life in order to lead the nation up from ruin, I was a nameless, unknown
soldier. Many of you here know just how difficult those first years of that
struggle really were. The way from a small movement of seven men to the taking
of power on January 30, 1933, as the responsible government is so miraculous
that only the blessing of Providence could have made it possible. Today I stand
at the head of the mightiest army in the world, the most powerful air force and
a proud navy. Behind and around me is a sacred community -- the [National
Socialist] Party -- with which I have become great and which has become great
through me.
Our adversaries today are the same
familiar enemies of more than twenty years. But the path before us cannot be
compared with the road we have already taken. Today the German people fully
realizes that this is a decisive hour for our existence. Millions of soldiers
are faithfully doing their duty under the most difficult conditions. Millions
of German farmers and workers, and German women and girls, are in the factories
and offices, in the fields and farm lands, working hard to feed our homeland
and supply weapons to the front. Allied with us are strong nations that have
suffered the same misery and face the same enemies.
The American President and his
plutocratic clique have called us the "have not" nations. That is
correct! But the "have nots" also want to live, and they will
certainly make sure that what little they have to live on is not stolen from
them by the "haves." You, my Party comrades, know of my relentless
determination to carry through to a successful conclusion any struggle that has
already commenced. You know of my determination in such a struggle to do
everything necessary to break all resistance that must be broken. In my first
speech [of this war] on September 1, 1939, I pledged that neither force of arms
nor time would defeat Germany. I want to assure my opponents that while neither
force of arms nor time will defeat us, in addition no internal uncertainty will
weaken us in the fulfillment of our duty.
When we think of the sacrifice and effort
of our soldiers, then every sacrifice of [those here in] the homeland is
completely insignificant and unimportant. And when we consider the number of
all those in past generations who gave their lives for the survival and
greatness of the German nation, then we are really conscious of the magnitude
of the duty that is ours.
But whoever tries to shirk this duty
has no right to be regarded as a fellow German. Just as we were pitilessly hard
in the struggle for power, so also will we be just as ruthless in the struggle
for the survival of our nation. During a time in which thousands of our best
men, the fathers and sons of our people, have given their lives, anyone in the
homeland who betrays the sacrifice on the front will forfeit his life.
Regardless of the pretext with which an attempt is made to disrupt the German
front, undermine the will to resist of our people, weaken the authority of the
regime, or sabotage the achievements of the homeland, the guilty person will
die. But with this difference: The soldier at the front who makes this
sacrifice will be held in the greatest honor, whereas the person who debases
this sacrifice of honor will die in disgrace.
Our opponents should not deceive
themselves. In the two thousand years of recorded German history, our people
have never been more determined and united than today. The Lord of the universe
has been so generous to us in recent years that we bow in gratitude before a
Providence that has permitted us to be members of such a great nation. We thank
Him, that along with those in earlier and coming generations of the German
nation, our deeds of honor may also be recorded in the eternal book of German
history!
No comments:
Post a Comment