by Mark
Weber
The popular image of this man, particularly in the
United States, is a crude caricature...
Contrary
to popular belief, Goebbels was successful as a propagandist not because he was
a master of the „Big Lie,“ but rather as a result of his fidelity to facts and
truth. As biographer Heiber notes: „Goebbels was accordingly able to celebrate
his information policy as being not only superior to the enemy’s in its
monolithic character, but also of a ‘seriousness and credibility’ which ‘simply
cannot be surpassed.’
The
boast could be made with some justification: „Seen in the long view, Goebbels
preached, the best propaganda is that which does no more than serve the truth.“
Goebbels’
frankness and even courage won him a measure of popular admiration. Writes
Heiber: He understood the value of admitting reverses and even, now and then,
errors; his readiness to be thus „candid“ was a kind of knowledgeable wink at
his audience -- „Look, I take you seriously. Let’s be frank with one another“
-- and enabled him to ensnare them all the more. The result was that later on,
after 1943, after he had borrowed ... the „blood, sweat and tears“ theme of
Churchill, people were ready to believe in the ray of hope which he astutely
let shine through the somber coloring of his speeches. [p. 134]
„As
other influential Nazis began to creep into their shells,“ comments Heiber, „Goebbels
could dare to appear before a mob and not only gain a hearing, but even arouse
faith and hope ...“ [p. 134]
As
the war dragged on, Goebbels’ front-page editorial essays in the weekly paper
Das Reich played an increasingly important role in sustaining public morale.
They were widely reprinted and routinely read over the radio. „His articles in
Das Reich,“ acknowledges Heiber, „were indeed excellent, brilliantly written,
and full of bright ideas ...“ [p. 235]
Heiber
also notes:
Goebbels’
articles were carefully worked out more than a week before they were to appear,
written in excellent, polished German, stylistically enjoyable and relatively
discriminating in content; often they seemed illumined by the lofty wisdom of a
great thinker. Their very titles were reminiscent of philosophical treatises: „On
the Meaning of War,“ „The Essential Nature of the Crisis,“ „On the Work of the
Spirit,“ „On Speaking and Being Silent,“ „The Indispensability of Freedom,“ „About
National Duty in War.“ ...It is all very well turned and very solid. These
articles made an impression, and Goebbels knew it. [ p. 252 ]
Regrettably,
little of what Goebbels wrote and said during the latter war years -- when he
was at the peak of his powers -- has been translated into English.
One
of Goebbels’ greatest wartime propaganda achievements was his exploitation of
the Katyn massacre story. In April 1943, the Germans discovered at Katyn, near
Smolensk in occupied Russia, a mass grave of thousands of Polish officers who
had been taken prisoner by the Soviets in 1939, and shot by Soviet secret
police in April 1940. On Goebbels’ orders, German newspapers and magazines
devoted great attention to the story, giving it weeks of detailed, often
front-page coverage. His astute treatment of the story contributed
significantly to a major Allied political defeat -- a break in relations
between the Soviet government and the Polish government-in-exile. (Meanwhile,
American and British officials and newspapers backed the Soviet lie that
Germans were responsible for the atrocity.)
In
addition to his work as the nation’s chief propagandist, during the war
Goebbels took on ever greater organizational and policy-making
responsibilities, playing an increasingly important role in keeping the nation’s
industrial and social machinery functioning. In February 1942 Hitler entrusted
him with special authority to oversee assistance to people ravaged in Allied
air attacks -- a post that was to assume ever greater importance as the aerial
bombardment of Germany steadily escalated.
In
the summer of 1944 Hitler named him „Reich Plenipotentiary for the Total War
Mobilization.“ Thus, during the final catastrophic months of the war Goebbels
-- along with Armaments Minister Albert Speer -- directed Germany’s human and
material resources for maximum war production, while simultaneously continuing
somehow to operate the nation’s electric power and water plants, transportation
and telephone systems, food and fuel supply networks, public schools, radio
broadcasting and daily newspaper publishing. This organizational feat of
keeping essential social and community services functioning, while at the same
time maintaining and even sharply increasing armaments production -- in spite
of devastating aerial bombardment and an ever worsening military situation --
is an achievement without historical parallel.
„We
have become a people on the defensive,“ Goebbels wrote in Das Reich of Feb. 11,
1945 -- eleven weeks before the end. „We work and we fight, we wander, we leave
our homes, we suffer and endure, and we do all this with a silent dignity
which, in the end, will arouse the admiration of the entire world. Europe may
well be happy that it still possesses such a people. Today this people is the
salvation of Europe. Tomorrow, therefore, it will be Europe’s pride.“
His
final radio address, broadcast over what remained of a tattered network, was
delivered on April 19, 1945. As he had done every year since 1933, he spoke on
the eve of Hitler’s birthday. Even on this occasion, when the terrible end was
glaringly obvious to all, Goebbels still spoke with eloquent, controlled
passion, frankly acknowledging the supreme gravity of the situation while
inspiring hope. He had not lost his ability to rouse his countrymen with fervor
as well as a certain seeming nobility.
„Do
not let yourself be disconcerted by the worldwide clamor that will now begin,“
he urged in a letter written to his stepson just days before his death. „There
will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and
truth will again triumph.“ In his final testament written just hours before he
took his life, Hitler named Goebbels as his successor as Chancellor -- a
tribute to steadfast loyalty even to the bitter end. But Goebbels held this
empty position for just a few hours. After he and his wife had their six
children put to death, and with Soviet troops just a few hundred yards away, on
the evening of May 1, 1945, Joseph and Magda Goebbels ended their lives in the
courtyard outside the Führerbunker.
Contrary
to popular belief, Goebbels was successful as a propagandist not because he was
a master of the „Big Lie,“ but rather as a result of his fidelity to facts and
truth. As biographer Heiber notes:
Goebbels
was accordingly able to celebrate his information policy as being not only
superior to the enemy’s in its monolithic character, but also of a „seriousness
and credibility“ which „simply cannot be surpassed.“ The boast could be made
with some justification: Seen in the long view, Goebbels preached, the best
propaganda is that which does no more than serve the truth.“ [p. 254]
„Goebbels’
real lies, his conscious lies, always pertained to mere detail ...,“ writes
Heiber. „Goebbels’ lies were more in the nature of those equivocations and
evasions by which government spokesmen everywhere seek to ‘protect’ the ‘national
interest’.“ [pp. 134, 135]
It
is also common to imagine that, however skilled, Goebbels was little more than
a clever ranter who won support from his countrymen by appealing to base
feelings of envy, revenge, conceit and arrogant pride. This view, which
implicitly demeans Germans as a nation of emotional and mental cripples, is
especially widespread in the United States. If he thinks about it at all, the
typical American imagines that if he had been living in Third Reich Germany, he
would not have „fallen“ for Goebbels’ „obvious“ lies.
Such
a self-flattering view is based on ignorance. In his classic study, Propaganda
(New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1968; Vintage, 1973 [p. 54]), French scholar
Jacques Ellul pointed out that Goebbels’ postwar image is itself a propaganda
distortion:
There
remains the problem of Goebbels’ reputation. He wore the title of Big Liar
(bestowed by Anglo-Saxon propaganda) and yet he never stopped battling for
propaganda to be as accurate as possible. He preferred being cynical and brutal
to being caught in a lie. He used to say: „Everybody must know what the
situation is.“ He was always the first to announce disastrous events or
difficult situations, without hiding anything. The result was a general belief
between 1939 and 1942 that German communiqués not only were more concise,
clearer and less cluttered, but were more truthful than Allied communiqués
(American and neutral opinion) -- and, furthermore, that the Germans published
all the news two or three days before the Allies. All this is so true that
pinning the title of Big Liar on Goebbels must be considered quite a propaganda
success.
From The Journal of Historical Review,
January-February 1995 (Vol. 15, No. 1), pages 19-21.
About the
Author
Mark
Weber studied history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the University
of Munich, Portland State University and Indiana University (M.A., 1977). In
March 1988 he testified for five days in Toronto District Court as a recognized
expert witness on Germany’s wartime Jewish policy and the Holocaust issue. He
was editor of the IHR’s Journal of Historical Review from April 1992 to
December 2000. He is currently Director of the Institute for Historical Review.
No comments:
Post a Comment