by Karl Haemers
Most
people in the US, Germany and swaths of the rest of the world conceive of Adolf
Hitler, Chancellor of Germany 1933-1945, as a psychopathic war-monger, flinging
his military might in every direction in a sadistic orgy of violence and blood,
seeking domination of the entire world. The truth is stranger than fiction, and
yet makes perfect sense.
We will look primarily at
the slim but dense book compiled by Dr. Friedrich Stieve, What the World
Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers 1933-1940, which presents this truth in
cogent form.
Just three and a half weeks
after he took office on January 30 1933, Chancellor Adolf Hitler gave a speech
to the Reichstag German Parliament on May 17 1933. In this speech the new
Chancellor addressed his resolve to establish arms reduction terms with
“neighbouring countries”, “armed nations” and “the rest of the world”.
“Germany will be perfectly
ready to disband her entire military establishment and destroy the small amount
of arms remaining to her, if the neighbouring countries will do the same thing
with equal thoroughness.
...Germany is entirely
ready to renounce aggressive weapons of every sort if the armed nations, on
their part, will destroy their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and
if their use is forbidden by an international convention.
...Germany is at all times
prepared to renounce aggressive weapons if the rest of the world does the same.
Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because she
does not think of attacking anybody but only of acquiring security.”
This speech proposed a
total elimination of all military capacity, which might be considered a
strategic move on Germany’s part, since Germany was limited by the Treaty of
Versailles to no air force, and an army of only 100,000 men devoted to domestic
activities only. Hitler’s previous political campaigns and those of the National
Socialist German Labour Party, stated openly their rejection of the Versailles
Treaty, and thus felt free to develop a stronger military if required by threats
from surrounding nations. Hitler was prepared to expand the German military
beyond Versailles’s limits, but proposed total disarmament.
Short of this, he proposed
elimination of “aggressive weapons” such as long-range bombers, poison gas and
large artillery, capable of striking civilian targets. Adolf Hitler was a
soldier of the prevailing ethos of the time, largely applied during World War 1,
of Civilized Warfare that among other provisions spared civilians the effects of
war as much as possible.1
The Response: No other
nation offered a formal reply, but some such as Britain and France continued to
increase their war munitions and troop strength. The League of Nations, from
Germany’s perspective primarily established to enforce the Treaty of Versailles
diktat, declared Germany must pass through a “probation period” before talk of
disarmament of other nations could proceed.2 Germany had already
complied with the Versailles diktat for fourteen years since 1919.
Five months later on
October 14 1933, Hitler withdrew Germany from the League of Nations. “This step
on October 19 1933, was a response to the Simon disarmament plan of October 14th
which denied Germany equality...”3
Two months later, on
December 18, Hitler offered his second proposal for peace and disarmament in
Europe. It contained six points, the first of which granted Germany “full
equality of rights”, a provision Hitler considered necessary to ensure peace. A
balance of military powers would deter aggression, while a weak Germany would
encourage it. The second point imposed a freeze on all arms increases, and the
third granted Germany freedom to restore a balance in her arms with neighbours.
The fourth required “conducting war on humane principles” and again called for
elimination of weapons that could harm civilians. The fifth provided for a
monitoring system to ensure compliance, and the sixth stated: “The European
nations guarantee one another the unconditional maintenance of peace by the
conclusion of non-aggression pacts, to be renewed after ten years.”
Soon after, Hitler
requested approval to increase the German army to 300,000 men, in order to
conduct a minimum defence according to the length of her perimeter (which
featured few natural defences such as mountains, ice sheets, deserts, multiple
wide rivers or oceans) and the strength of her neighbours’ armies.
The response:
a correspondence of official letters seeming to consider the proposal, leading
to a clear “no” from France, accompanied by “tremendous increases” in the
armaments in France, Britain and the USSR.4
By March 16 1935 Hitler
felt the need to bring back conscription in Germany. Soon afterward however, he
gave a speech on May 21 1935 which once again focused on eliminating weaponry
that could harm “non-combatant women and children”. He referred to the Geneva
Red Cross Convention and proposed expanding it to eliminate aerial bombing
altogether: “...there might be prohibition of the dropping of gas, incendiary
and explosive bombs outside the real battle zone. This limitation could then be
extended to complete international outlawry of all bombing.”
Hitler left the
possibilities for full disarmament open: “(Germany) gives further assurance that
it will agree to any international limitations or abolition of arms whatsoever
for a uniform space of time.”
The response:
France signed an alliance with the Soviet Union, furthering the encirclement
policy of aggressor nations around Germany.5
As so often in history,
action begets reaction begets counter-reaction. Far too much history assessing
Germany and its Chancellor fails to mention this causal chain of provocation,
focusing exclusively on Germany’s actions as if they occurred in the isolation
of mindless war-mongering mania.
Hitler’s orders to
re-occupy the Rhineland lying between Germany and France and occupied by French
forces at times since Versailles was a direct result of France’s rejection of
Hitler’s proposals, and France’s alliance with the Soviets. The Rhineland was a
key corridor of attack by France into Germany, and Hitler knew he had to take
back this region that had traditionally belonged to Germany and contained
predominantly German people.
The Wehrmacht crossed into
the Rhineland with no opposition – and with joyous citizen approval – on March
3, 1936. By March 31, Hitler was offering his fourth peace plan in three years.
Its goal was “the peace of Europe” and “the social happiness and economic
prosperity of the nations”.
This peace plan was the
most extensive yet, a number of its nineteen points addressing the presence of
German troops in the Rhineland in an attempt to reassure France. It called for a
Commission presided by Britain and Italy to oversee peace terms among Germany,
France and Belgium, and inviting the Netherlands to participate. Germany was
willing to “agree to any military limitations on the German western frontier”. A
twenty-five year “non-aggression or security pact” between France and Belgium,
and Germany, was proposed.
Point 15 needs special
focus:
“In order to stamp this
peace-pact... as the reconciliatory conclusion of a centuries-old dispute,
Germany and France pledge themselves to take steps to see that in the education
of the young, as well as in the press and publications of both nations,
everything shall be avoided which might be calculated to poison the relationship
between the two peoples, whether it be a derogatory or contemptuous attitude, or
improper interference in the internal affairs of the other country.”
In Point 18 Hitler also
declared his willingness to re-join Germany to the League of Nations, provided
it addressed: “...the question of colonial equality of rights and that of the
separation of the Covenant of the League of Nations from its foundations in the
Versailles Treaty...” Chancellor Hitler, his party the NSDAP and most of the
German people saw confiscation of German colonies given to other European
nations as a gross injustice, more so since Germany lacked key resources as it
increased its industrial output. They viewed the League of Nations as an
enforcement structure for limitations on Germany through the appalling
Versailles Treaty. Hitler said he would re-join Germany to the League if it
“cleared up” these injustices.
Point 19 proposed
establishing an “International Court of Arbitration” to ensure compliance with
the peace plan. Once again, Hitler proposed arms reduction treaties, prohibiting
gas and incendiary bombs, bombing of civilian towns or villages, and abolishing
heavy tank and large artillery production.
Hitler then focused on
prospects for economic growth and well-being:
“The German Government
believes that if even a first step is made on the road to disarmament, this will
be of enormous importance to the relationship between the nations, and to the
recovery of confidence, trade and prosperity.
“In accordance with the general desire for the restoration of favourable
economic conditions, the German government is prepared
... to enter into an
exchange of opinions on economic problems
... to do all in its power
to improve the economic situation in Europe, and the world...”6
Hitler closed with hope:
“The German Government
believes that... it has made its contribution to the reconstruction of a new
Europe on the basis of reciprocal respect and confidence between sovereign
states. Many opportunities for such a pacification of Europe, for which Germany
has so often in the last few years made her proposals, have been neglected. May
this attempt to achieve European understanding succeed at last!”
The response:
Britain alone sent a dismissive insincere questionnaire, and then established
itself as France’s Protector, beginning joint military staff discussions, as
before World War 1.7
War propaganda against
National Socialist Germany to this day maintains that Germany’s economy boomed
at the time exclusively from arms production, but repeatedly we see within these
peace proposals of Chancellor Hitler the view that peacetime economies among the
nations of Europe generate prosperity. It is commonly said that the US economy
did not revive from the Great Depression until war production increased, and
immense Soviet war production long before its entry into World War 2 destroyed
living conditions for the Russian people.8 Hitler had another view
and promoted it in his proposals: peace prosperity.
Between Hitler’s arms
reduction proposal of May 1935 and France’s alliance with the Soviet Union,
Hitler signed a Naval Agreement with Great Britain on June 18 1935. Hitler knew
Germany’s naval strength, particularly its U-boat fleet, was a reason for the
outbreak of World War 1 with Great Britain, and sought to soothe any British
concerns by limiting Germany’s naval fleet to 35% of the British fleet.9
Turning to Poland, as early
as January 26, 1934 Hitler and the Polish leader Pilsudski formed a
non-aggression pact, and consented “to settle directly all questions of whatever
sort which concern their mutual relations”.10 Major issues existed
between the two central European nations, primarily the large populations of
Germans now living in the “Polish Corridor”, formerly West Prussia, and the city
of Danzig, formally a “Free City” under the League of Nations, but de facto
dominated by the Polish authorities.11 Ethnic Germans now forced to
live in Poland – Volksdeutschen – suffered brutal persecution and even massacres
under these arrangements.12 They wanted to be brought back into the
Reich, and while Hitler too wanted to reunite all of the German family, he knew
he needed alliance with Poland and was cautious of making demands.13
After Pilsudski’s death in
May 1935, Polish attitudes toward Germany worsened. Persecution of the
Volksdeutchen became intolerable. Still, Hitler made numerous peace offers,
economic treaties and alliance proposals.14 He knew Poland was a
critical ally and buffer state against the inevitable aggression of Stalin and
the Soviet Union.
The response: Britain and then France offered Poland an unconditional guarantee
of protection against any outside aggression. This was clearly intended against
Germany. The Roosevelt administration in the US stocked with Communist Jews
urged Britain into this arrangement.15 This was a key development
which led directly to the real start of World War 2. The German-Polish conflict
could have remained local as Hitler stated, if not for the guarantee Britain and
France offered Poland, and which Poland accepted.
Still another peace
agreement Hitler participated in was the Munich Agreement of September 28 1938,
at which Britain, France, Italy and Germany agreed to the peaceful dissolution
of the artificial state of Czechoslovakia, and the return of the Sudetenland
which held millions of ethnic Germans, back to Germany. The Czech portion of the
region, with the largest ethnic population, invited the German military in as a
peace-keeping force.16 Neville Chamberlain, British Prime Minister,
returned declaring he had maintained peace in Europe, but privately knew he had
only arranged more time to prepare for war against Germany.17
Immediately after, on the
30th, Hitler and Chamberlain signed an agreement, which contained the
statements: “...the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one
another again.”, and “...contribute to assure the peace of Europe.”18
The response: Chamberlain
increased British arms production, and now that the Czech area had been lost as
part of the encirclement plan against Germany, began new plans for encirclement.19
On December 6 1938, Hitler
through his Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop signed a peace agreement with
France. It stated: “...peaceful and good neighbourly relations between Germany
and France constitute one of the most essential elements for the consolidation
of the situation in Europe and the maintenance of general peace.” They both
agreed the borders between the two nations were undisputed, and agreed to
consult over future issues.
Slightly earlier, on
October 24, Hitler presented a proposal to Poland on generous terms for the
return of Danzig to Germany, and construction of an autobahn and railroad
through the Polish Corridor (West Prussia) to connect Germany with its severed
East Prussia region. Hitler offered to allow the Poles to use this
transportation avenue as well at no cost, strengthening economic activities
between the two nations. The proposal contained a twenty-five year nonaggression
pact as well. No ultimatums were issues in this proposal, and no deadlines
declared.20
The response:
The Poles refused. They threatened to claim Danzig for Poland and prepared for
military action against Germany.21
The certainty of conflict
with Poland necessitated a German nonaggression agreement with the Soviet Union.
By August 23 1939 the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was signed, declaring “spheres of
influence” for the USSR and Germany, and ensuring neither nation would attack
the other. While this is considered another of Hitler’s peace measures – or at
least avoidance of war – it is understood that both sides planned to break the
agreement, Stalin at the time when European nations had exhausted themselves
fighting each other, and Hitler when it was necessary to pre-empt the Soviet
invasion.22
Two days later, Chancellor
Hitler made his final peace appeal to Great Britain, in which Germany would
“safeguard the existence of the British Empire” and “guarantee German assistance
for the British Empire...” It also once again offered arms limitations, and
assured that Germany would attempt no revision of borders in Western Europe.23
The response:
August 25, Britain and France affirmed their guarantee to defend Poland from
aggression, formally signed on March 31 1939 by the three nations.24
Earlier in August 1939 the Poles increased their attacks on German nationals in
Poland, and many Volksdeutschen attempted escape into Germany.25
After Poland was swiftly
defeated, on October 6 Adolf Hitler gave a speech in the Reichstag, in which
three main points were presented for “not only a belief in, but a sense of,
European security”. The first recognized the Treaty of Versailles as “obsolete”
and recommended the return of Germany’s colonies “based on political justice and
sane economic principles”. The second called for a “reorganization of the
international economic system” so that “unrestricted trade” could flourish. The
third once more advocated arms reductions to protect civilian women and
children. “It is only when this is achieved that peace can reign... a peace
which, uncontaminated by suspicion and fear, will provide the only possible
condition for real economic prosperity.”26
The response:
No response emerged from any European nations. The following spring, Britain and
France, having declared war on Germany, fielded an immense army pointed at
Germany through Belgium. Belgium participated by supporting infrastructure to
pass the army through to Germany. French Prime Minister Daladier publicly
rejected the proposal against many in the Parliament who approved.27
After French and British
armies were subdued within six weeks, Chancellor Hitler presented another
Reichstag speech on July 19th 1940, translated into English and dropped as
leaflets by Luftwaffe planes into British cities. Titled “A Last Appeal to
Reason”, one if its main goals was “to direct, once again and for the last time,
an appeal to general reason”. Hitler claimed “the National Socialist Movement
has (delivered Germany) from the Jewish-capitalist shackles imposed by a
plutocratic-democratic, dwindling class of exploiters...” and identified those
responsible for the war as “Jews and Freemasons, international traders and
stock-traders...”. He stated: “If Mr. Churchill or any other warmongers had but
a fraction of the sense of responsibility I felt toward Europe, they could not
have played so perfidious a game”. Hitler reminded that it was the goal of the
NSDAP to be allies with Italy and Britain.
“It still saddens me today
that, in spite of all my endeavours, I have not succeeded in obtaining this
friendship with England which, I believe, should have been a blessing for both
peoples; and especially because I was not able to do so despite my persistent,
sincere efforts”.
He spoke of Germany’s
alliance with Fascist Italy as “...the alliance which is destined to procure a
new life for Europe.” In this speech, Hitler makes one of his most succinct and
clear statements of his vision: “It was not my ambition to wage wars, but to
build up a new social state of the highest culture. And every year of war takes
me away from my work.”
With prospects for war
against Great Britain continuing, and “warmonger” Churchill in power, Hitler
said:
“I see no compelling reason
which could force the continuation of this war... I know of the women and
mothers at home whose hearts, despite their willingness to sacrifice to the
(end), hang onto this last with all their might.”28
The response:
Britain had been bombing German civilian cities since May 10th, and a month
after Hitler’s speech Churchill ordered Germany’s capital Berlin bombed for the
first time. Hitler responded in kind in September, four months after British
civilian bombing campaigns had begun against Germany.
In the end, German
Chancellor Adolf Hitler made one last Political Testament as the Red Army forces
were advancing on his Berlin bunker from the East, and American and British
forces were approaching from the West. On April 29 1945 he dictated his
thoughts, which included the following statements:
“It is not true that I or
anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated
exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish origin or
who worked for Jewish interests.
“I have made too many
offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not be
able to disregard forever – for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war
to be laid on me. I have furthermore never wished that after the first
disastrous world war a second should arise against England, much less against
America.”
Here he identifies “...whom
we have to thank for all this: International Jewry and its helpers!”
Hitler points to his
“proposal to the British ambassador in Berlin (of) a solution to the
German-Polish problem” as proof of his peaceful intentions.
Again he identifies
“international conspirators in money and finance” and “the people that is really
guilty of this murderous conflict... Jewry!”
Hitler closes his last
Political Testament before his immanent death:
“Above all I enjoin the
leaders of the nation and their followers to scrupulous observance of the laws
of race, and to merciless resistance to the universal poisoner of all peoples,
international Jewry.”29
What the World Rejected
ends with two
chapters, one Hermann Goring’s letter from the Nuremberg Trials to Winston
Churchill, blaming Churchill for forcing war on Germany, allowing Europe to be
overrun by “Asiatics” (Soviets and Jews?) and destruction of the British Empire.
The final chapter addresses the diaries of James Forrestal, Secretary of the US
Navy toward the end of the war and first US Secretary of Defence afterward, in
which British PM Neville Chamberlain had stated: “America and the world Jews had
forced England into the war.” Since America, especially the FDR administration,
was largely under Jewish influence, this statement could be considered
redundant.
Over eighty years of
ongoing Jewish war propaganda depicting Adolf Hitler, National Socialist
Chancellor of Germany, as a war-monger and lusting after bloody conflict are not
only refuted, but inverted by the historical record presented in What the
World Rejected. Adolf Hitler can more accurately be called Peace Maker. The
fact that he did not succeed is no fault of his, but of those he so clearly
accused of being the actual war-mongers of World War 2.
Hitler makes multiple viable offers of peace and all are rejected:
1st offer:
May 17, 1933
2nd offer:
December 18, 1933
3rd offer:
May 21, 1935
4th offer:
March 31, 1936
5th offer:
September 30, 1938
6th offer:
December 6, 1938
7th offer:
In late 1939, Hitler offered Poland a peaceful settlement to the Danzig issue.
8th offer: Plan for world
peace made on October 6, 1939, just over a month after Britain and France had
declared war on Germany for invading Poland on September 1 (but not on the USSR,
which also invaded Po- land on September 17).
Final offer:
Hitler’s “Appeal for Peace
and Sanity” speech, made before the Reichstag on July 19, 1940, following the
fall of France. In that speech, Hitler once again offered unconditional peace to
Britain. This speech was printed in English and dropped by the tens of thousands
from German aircraft over Britain. Although nearly half the British cabinet
wanted to take Hitler up on his offer, Churchill put an end to this final peace
offer.
Endnotes:
1. FJP Veal, Advance to
Barbarism, C C Nelson Publishing Co, Appleton Wisconsin, 1953
2. Dr. Friedrich Stieve,
What the World Rejected: Hitler’s Peace Offers 1933-1940, Ostara
Publications, first published 1940 ppg 4-6
3. David L Hoggan, The
Forced War, When Peaceful Revision Failed, Catholic Resources, Chattanooga
TN, 2020 p. 26
4. Stieve, p 6
5. Ibid, ppg 6-8
6. Ibid, p 14
7. Ibid, ppg 8-15
8. Viktor Suvorov, The
Chief Culprit, Naval Institute Press, Anapolis MD, 2008
9. Stieve, p 15
10. Ibid, p 17
11. Hoggan, 37-50, 141,
12. Ibid, 134-7, 224-6
13. Ibid, p 32, 47-8
14. Ibid, ppg 67-8, 106,
121-124, 220-1, 278-9. 285-6,472-4, 477-81, 485-6
15. Herbert Hoover,
Freedom Betrayed, Hoover Institution Press, Stanford CA, 2011, Chapter 4
“Infiltration of Members of the Communist Party into the Federal Government”,
ppg 34-47
16. Walendy, ppg 127-9
17. Udo Walendy, Truth
for Germany, Barnes Review, Washington DC, 2013, ppg 82-115.
18. Stieve, p 18
19. Ibid, p 20
20. Walendy, ppg 215-238
21. Stieve, p 20
22. Viktor Suvorov,
Icebreaker, Hamish Hamilton, London England, 1990
23. Stieve, p 21
24. Hoggan, 296-8
25. Ibid, pp. 343, 399-400
26. Ibid, pp. 21-26
27. Ibid, pp. 46, footnote
17
28. Ibid, pp. 30-74
29.
Ibid, pp. 75-80
